Why cohesion is key to Spurs success - and Everton failure
Written by Simon Austin — October 31, 2017
TOTTENHAM’S 3-0 demolition of Everton at Goodison Park in September shocked the pundits.
After all, many fancied the Toffees to challenge for a top-four place because of their summer transfer splurge, whereas Spurs were tipped to stagnate or even struggle due to their comparative inactivity.
In a pre-season prediction piece on the Premier League's official website, Phil Neville, Owen Hargreaves, Peter Schmeichel and Matt Holland all marked Everton down as their ‘surprise package’ for the season. Only one of the eight tipsters – Schmeichel – had Spurs down for a top-four spot.
Following the match, Robbie Savage said Everton's only answer was to spend even more.
“To reach the top four he [Koeman] will have to spend nearer £500million and attract world-class players,” the former midfielder wrote in his Mirror column.
Such thinking is perhaps symptomatic of the “broken system” that Australian firm Gain Line Analytics have described following their research into levels of teamwork and cohesion in the Premier League.
Spurs' perceived weakness - the fact they signed only three new players for the first team in the summer - was actually a strength. Nine of their starting line-up at Goodison that day had been with the club for three years or more, while all but two (Serge Aurier and Moussa Sissoko) had been there for at least two years.
In stark contrast, only one member of Everton’s team – Leighton Baines – had been with the club for even two years. Seven of them had been recruits during that one hectic transfer window.
You might regard this as mere coincidence, but Gain Line's research into a number of sports (including into the Premier League, all the way back to its inception in 1992), shows a strong link between cohesion and success.
Their simple algorithm is: skill x cohesion = performance capacity.
Now, of course, money can trump lack of cohesion if enough is spent, as Chelsea and Manchester City have shown; but not for too long.
Gainline was set up by former Australia rugby union international Ben Darwin and performance analyst Simon Strachan in 2013. With the help of an algorithm developed by Harvard doctoral student Patrick Ferguson, they came up with the Teamwork Index (TWI), a measure of cohesion.
As with all the best ideas, the concept behind TWI is common sense. If you’ve trained with, and played alongside, a team-mate for a number of seasons you’ll intuitively know what they do: the runs they make, which foot they like to receive the ball on, what their personality is like and so on.
“We call this the juggler effect,” Strachan tells TGG. “If you and I start juggling together, after a few months we’ll be pretty good together; after a year we’ll be very good; and after five years we might be world champions.
“But if I switch to a different partner after six months, I’ll have a period of adaptation and my skill improvement will pause – and theirs will too.”
Gainline’s research shows that, on average, it takes a signing three years to hit their peak at a new club – and potentially even longer if they have come from a foreign league.
The transition into the first team – for either a new signing or Academy graduate – will be easier if the TWI is already high in the team, as is the case with Spurs.
“In a high-cohesion environment, everyone is performing to capacity,” Strachan says. “If you are a low cohesion team, it doesn’t matter what the quality of the new player is, they won’t look very good. They will be developing relationships with guys who are developing relationships with each other.”
In Ben Lyttleton’s excellent book Edge, there is a chapter on cohesion, in which Darwin, says: “If I was a young athlete, I would find a cohesive organisation and take a 50% pay cut, as the rewards would come later.”
Maybe people should bear this in mind when urging Harry Kane to move from Spurs to another club to get a bigger salary.
And guess which team had the lowest TWI at Euro 2016? Yes, England, hampered as they were by Roy Hodgson's tinkering with the team before and even during the tournament.
“Their numbers were diabolical,” Darwin says. “The skill is there but the cohesion is not, so the collective is getting worse.”
England's conquerors, tiny Iceland, had one of the best TWIs because they have so few players to choose from and a very settled side. Ditto semi-finalists Wales.
Gainline are currently working with teams in rugby union, rugby league and the Premier League. So what exactly do they do?
“The first thing we do is a performance audit,” Strachan explains. "We do a complete history of their record going back to the start of the Premier League at least.
“We will look at who they signed and the history of each player: how many years they been there and at other clubs, whether they played with any of their current team-mates, which positions they’ve played. We will have their TWI and correlate it against performance.
“The idea is to show the club that the way they recruit impacts on performance. This shows the club that recruiting is not necessarily around talent but the impact it’s had on team performance.”
Gain Line also produce something called "accumulated continuity measures", which allow the coach "to do some work around the best selection and how it will affect the outcome” on a game-by-game basis.
Strachan says this measure has 75% accuracy in predicting the outcome of matches, opposed to 65% from the bookies. Despite this compelling evidence about cohesion, the number of transfers in the Premier League is increasing season on season.
“The cohesion of the Premier League has actually dropped 30% since it started in 1992,” Strachan says. “The system is broken.”
There is potentially some good news for Everton though. Their TWI could improve significantly in the coming seasons, because they already have a number of outstanding young players in their squad who can develop together. A bit like Spurs.